#485 – 1916-17 5c Washington Imperforate Carmine Error

Just 50 of These Rare Errors Exist!

This mint block of nine stamps is a very rare error – only 50 were produced and Mystic has one of them.  Look at the illustration – there’s a five-cent stamp (#485) surrounded by eight two-cent stamps (#482)! 

How did a 5¢ stamp find its way onto a 2¢ stamp sheet?

This story begins in 1917, during the height of World War I, with an overworked and understaffed Bureau of Engraving and Printing struggling to keep up with war-time demands. An inspector at the Bureau proofed a sheet printed by plate 7942 of the current 2¢ issue, Scott #463. Three of the impressions made by the plate were found to be unsatisfactory, and the inspector ordered them replaced.

To understand what happened next, it’s important to know how these plates were produced. First a design is engraved on steel. Proofs are taken from this engraving. Once these proofs are approved, the steel of the original engraving is hardened, and it becomes the “die”. A transfer press is then used to transfer the die’s impression onto a cylinder of soft steel, known as the “roll,” which is in turn hardened. This roll is then put in a “siderographer’s” transfer press, which again transfers this image into the steel plates that are used to print the stamps. In short, a die is used to make a roll, which is used to make the printing plates.

On plate 7942, the impressions for stamps 74 and 84 on the upper left pane of 100, and stamp 18 in the lower right pane were found to be defective. The worker who repaired these three impressions accidentally replaced the 2¢ designs with 5¢ designs. Considering that the “5” on the transfer roll is very similar to a reversed “2”, it’s not surprising this mistake was made.

Because of the great strain placed upon the overworked employees of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, the proof sheet was not inspected again. Production continued, and the sheets were eventually distributed to Post Offices.

Soon blocks of twelve containing a vertical pair of 5¢ stamps (sometimes referred to as the “double error’) and blocks of nine containing a single 5¢ stamp (often referred to as the “single error”) began to appear. Although the Post Office recalled all the sheets bearing the plate number 7942, some had already been sold and put into circulation.

Only One Available

Now you have the chance to own this rare imperforate error block of nine in mint condition.  The #485 stamp in the center even features never-hinged gum.  Stamp expert Max G. Johl described the block as “one of the rarities of the 20th century” and he was right!  Mystic only has one block, so order now to avoid disappointment.

 

Mail During World War I

On November 2, 1917, the first class mail rate was raised from 2¢ to 3¢ to help cover the cost of the war effort.

Prior to this, the domestic letter rate for a one-ounce letter had been 2¢ since 1885.  However, after the US entered World War I, the Post Office increased the rate to 3¢ on November 2, 1917.  The extra 1¢ per ounce was charged as a war tax.  The money raised by this tax was transferred to the Treasury’s general fund each month.

Prior to this change, 3¢ stamps saw little use.  They didn’t satisfy any direct rate, but were sometimes used along with a 2¢ stamp to make up the 5¢ foreign letter rate or with the 10¢ denomination to pay foreign registration.  This change greatly increased the demand for 3¢ stamps – and also for 1¢ stamps, to go with 2¢ stamps and stamped envelopes already purchased.

The new wartime rates meant the 3¢ stamp plates would be used more heavily than before.  Operating at full capacity, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing found its ink to be of poor quality.  Most of the high-quality ink came from Germany, and World War I interrupted the supply.  The ink contained so much grit that printing plates wore out in about 10 days, faster than it took to make them.  Therefor, the Bureau switched temporarily to offset printing, for which plates could be produced much more rapidly. 

One of the negative aspects of using this method, however, was a less defined and somewhat blurry image.  Some designs were modified in order to achieve a better impression.  The lower quality of available ink combined with the deterioration of the Type I plates led to a decision that the plate dies would be cut deeper to prevent them from wearing out too quickly.  This led to several different “types” of some stamps.  These types have small differences in their engravings by which they can be identified.  Later, a more satisfactory ink was found, and the higher quality engraving process used previously was re-established.

After the war ended the domestic letter rate was returned to 2¢ on June 30, 1919.  The Victory stamp was the only 3¢ U.S. commemorative issued to pay the first-class letter rate during that period. 

Over the course of the war, many countries depleted their resources.  Items such as food, clothing, and machinery were greatly needed, and the US responded by sending shipments of supplies to the war-torn countries such as France and Russia.  High-value stamps were needed to prepay postage and registry on international packages, and it was decided to release stamps with both $2 and $5 denominations.  The sudden demand for these issues, however, did not allow time for new designs to be prepared.  So, the designs from the 1902 series were used.  Identical in color and design, the 1917 issues can be distinguished by their lack of a watermark.

In 1918, the Bureau finally found the time to prepare new designs.  On August 19th, the $2 and $5 stamps were released carrying portraits of Ben Franklin.  In addition to being printed horizontally, they were also printed using two colors. The changes were made so postal clerks could easily tell the difference between these stamps and the lower denominations.

The $2 stamp was approved in dark red; however, due to an error, it was first printed in orange.  Unfortunately, the error was not discovered until the stamps had been printed and distributed.  When the Bureau received the proper ink, the stamps were printed in the intended color and redistributed.  Collectors, however, not realizing the orange version was the error, stocked up on the dark red issue.  Today, this error is extremely scarce.  Although the shades of green on the $5 issue vary somewhat, they are all classified as deep green.

 
 
 

   

 Read More - Click Here


Just 50 of These Rare Errors Exist!

This mint block of nine stamps is a very rare error – only 50 were produced and Mystic has one of them.  Look at the illustration – there’s a five-cent stamp (#485) surrounded by eight two-cent stamps (#482)! 

How did a 5¢ stamp find its way onto a 2¢ stamp sheet?

This story begins in 1917, during the height of World War I, with an overworked and understaffed Bureau of Engraving and Printing struggling to keep up with war-time demands. An inspector at the Bureau proofed a sheet printed by plate 7942 of the current 2¢ issue, Scott #463. Three of the impressions made by the plate were found to be unsatisfactory, and the inspector ordered them replaced.

To understand what happened next, it’s important to know how these plates were produced. First a design is engraved on steel. Proofs are taken from this engraving. Once these proofs are approved, the steel of the original engraving is hardened, and it becomes the “die”. A transfer press is then used to transfer the die’s impression onto a cylinder of soft steel, known as the “roll,” which is in turn hardened. This roll is then put in a “siderographer’s” transfer press, which again transfers this image into the steel plates that are used to print the stamps. In short, a die is used to make a roll, which is used to make the printing plates.

On plate 7942, the impressions for stamps 74 and 84 on the upper left pane of 100, and stamp 18 in the lower right pane were found to be defective. The worker who repaired these three impressions accidentally replaced the 2¢ designs with 5¢ designs. Considering that the “5” on the transfer roll is very similar to a reversed “2”, it’s not surprising this mistake was made.

Because of the great strain placed upon the overworked employees of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, the proof sheet was not inspected again. Production continued, and the sheets were eventually distributed to Post Offices.

Soon blocks of twelve containing a vertical pair of 5¢ stamps (sometimes referred to as the “double error’) and blocks of nine containing a single 5¢ stamp (often referred to as the “single error”) began to appear. Although the Post Office recalled all the sheets bearing the plate number 7942, some had already been sold and put into circulation.

Only One Available

Now you have the chance to own this rare imperforate error block of nine in mint condition.  The #485 stamp in the center even features never-hinged gum.  Stamp expert Max G. Johl described the block as “one of the rarities of the 20th century” and he was right!  Mystic only has one block, so order now to avoid disappointment.

 

Mail During World War I

On November 2, 1917, the first class mail rate was raised from 2¢ to 3¢ to help cover the cost of the war effort.

Prior to this, the domestic letter rate for a one-ounce letter had been 2¢ since 1885.  However, after the US entered World War I, the Post Office increased the rate to 3¢ on November 2, 1917.  The extra 1¢ per ounce was charged as a war tax.  The money raised by this tax was transferred to the Treasury’s general fund each month.

Prior to this change, 3¢ stamps saw little use.  They didn’t satisfy any direct rate, but were sometimes used along with a 2¢ stamp to make up the 5¢ foreign letter rate or with the 10¢ denomination to pay foreign registration.  This change greatly increased the demand for 3¢ stamps – and also for 1¢ stamps, to go with 2¢ stamps and stamped envelopes already purchased.

The new wartime rates meant the 3¢ stamp plates would be used more heavily than before.  Operating at full capacity, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing found its ink to be of poor quality.  Most of the high-quality ink came from Germany, and World War I interrupted the supply.  The ink contained so much grit that printing plates wore out in about 10 days, faster than it took to make them.  Therefor, the Bureau switched temporarily to offset printing, for which plates could be produced much more rapidly. 

One of the negative aspects of using this method, however, was a less defined and somewhat blurry image.  Some designs were modified in order to achieve a better impression.  The lower quality of available ink combined with the deterioration of the Type I plates led to a decision that the plate dies would be cut deeper to prevent them from wearing out too quickly.  This led to several different “types” of some stamps.  These types have small differences in their engravings by which they can be identified.  Later, a more satisfactory ink was found, and the higher quality engraving process used previously was re-established.

After the war ended the domestic letter rate was returned to 2¢ on June 30, 1919.  The Victory stamp was the only 3¢ U.S. commemorative issued to pay the first-class letter rate during that period. 

Over the course of the war, many countries depleted their resources.  Items such as food, clothing, and machinery were greatly needed, and the US responded by sending shipments of supplies to the war-torn countries such as France and Russia.  High-value stamps were needed to prepay postage and registry on international packages, and it was decided to release stamps with both $2 and $5 denominations.  The sudden demand for these issues, however, did not allow time for new designs to be prepared.  So, the designs from the 1902 series were used.  Identical in color and design, the 1917 issues can be distinguished by their lack of a watermark.

In 1918, the Bureau finally found the time to prepare new designs.  On August 19th, the $2 and $5 stamps were released carrying portraits of Ben Franklin.  In addition to being printed horizontally, they were also printed using two colors. The changes were made so postal clerks could easily tell the difference between these stamps and the lower denominations.

The $2 stamp was approved in dark red; however, due to an error, it was first printed in orange.  Unfortunately, the error was not discovered until the stamps had been printed and distributed.  When the Bureau received the proper ink, the stamps were printed in the intended color and redistributed.  Collectors, however, not realizing the orange version was the error, stocked up on the dark red issue.  Today, this error is extremely scarce.  Although the shades of green on the $5 issue vary somewhat, they are all classified as deep green.